Subject: RE: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug? From: Jeff Beadle <Jbeadle@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 16:57:57 -0400 |
David, You can't be serious ... maybe you are. When I saw the reference to Wolfram I got a bit reminisce of the good old university days and got a bit carried away I guess, but thanks for the clarification. -Jeff -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:41 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first. Microsoft bug? > >See for example the definition given here: > >http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LexicographicOrder.html > > Mathematica rules! That happened to be the first site returned by google, but it's the standard mathematical definition, nothing to do with mathematica. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case first., David Carlisle |
RE: AW: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case fi, David Carlisle | Date | Re: AW: [xsl] Sorting Upper-Case fi, David Carlisle |
Month |