|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XML Dom Caching From: Kanthi <kan_manikoth@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:35:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Ok, let me try this out and see how it goes. Thanks
for the reply.
Kan
--- Jennifer Phillips <jennifer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >I appreciate the reply. So it looks I will have to
> >clone the node if I want to use the cached DOM
> without
> >directly making changes to it during the processing
> of
> >my code.
>
> If you are changing the data in the DOM yes. I had
> a similar problem, I
> wanted to add a parameter block to my cached XML
> data, what I ended up doing
> was sending a tree fragment to the XSLT processor as
> a parameter, rather
> than adding the parameter block to the cached XML
> via the DOM.
>
> The trouble with cloning the cached XML, you loose
> most of the performance
> benefits of caching the XML in the first place.
>
> >i.e Using, set objDOM =
> Application("CachedXMLData")
> >will cause the "CachedXMLData" to be altered if
> objDOM
> >is altered. Am I correct in thinking this?
>
> Yes you are correct.
>
> Jenni Phillips
>
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive:
> http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XML Dom Caching, Jennifer Phillips | Thread | [xsl] Using a StreamResult as a Str, John . Coffie |
| [xsl] side effects when debugging, Nick Laqua | Date | Re: [xsl] OFF Subject..., Mulberry Technologie |
| Month |