Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Incrementing a Global variable From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 12:28:06 -0400 |
I agree with you on this point that f(x) + f(x) can be optimized to 2*f(x) if f(x) does'nt do any side effect execution.. IMHO, are we not trying to justify the functional nature of XSLT from a pure computer science point of view.. But probably we have to accept this functional nature of XSLT, as the optimizations possible, and the processing model it facilitates far outweigh little advantages some *side effect producing* features may give..
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Incrementing a Global, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: Incrementing a Global, Michael Kay |
Re: Passing element nodes through s, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] From a string to node-set, Dongling Ding |
Month |