Subject: RE: [xsl] Automatically copying an element's attributes and their values From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:11:25 -0400 |
I'm interested in people's views on "recoverable errors". In the case of errors like this that are clearly under the control of the stylesheet author, should we be making them non-recoverable (fatal) errors? Most of the new run-time error conditions in XSLT 2.0 are non-recoverable, but the old 1.0 ones haven't changed much. I think the original reasoning was that with client-side transformations in particular, it's better to put anything on the screen rather than a syntax error message. Does anyone think that's a valid argument?
Regards, Wendell
Michael Kay
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Automatically copying an , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Entering invalid XML in XSLT , Mary McRae |
[xsl] sorting AND copying of XML vi, marcel salathe | Date | Re: [xsl] Generate key with further, David Carlisle |
Month |