Subject: [xsl] Re: Identity Transform From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 06:59:34 +0200 |
"Abie Hamaoui" <ahama5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:LAW9-F105p9zYgPugu300037959@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > hello there, > why does the standard identity transform use copy instead of copy-of? Because <xsl:copy-of select="/"> is useless -- why create exactly the file you already have (and why just not use the file-system copy command)? What people really want to do is modify (add, delete, change value) only some specific nodes while basically copying all the remaining. To be able to do this we need a template which matches every node (in fact no template can match a namespace node), so that it can be overriden by whatever templates are necessary for our special nodes processing for any possible node. This flexibility exsctly is provided by the identity template. ===== Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev. http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/ -- the home of FXSL XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Identity Transform, Adam Turoff | Thread | RE: [xsl] Identity Transform, Passin, Tom |
Re: [xsl] Grouping question, Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] Grouping question, Tristan Griffiths |
Month |