Subject: Re: [xsl] literal result elements vs. <xsl:element> From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:38:08 +0100 |
The only time you need to use xsl:element is if you want to generate the element name dynamically you can go <xsl:element name="{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}">.... but you can not go <{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}> ... The other use is as a way of avoiding namespace aliasing and generateing elements in the xsl namespace <xsl:element name="xsl:for-each"> generates an <xsl:for-each element but of course <xsl:for-each would be executed as xsl code. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] literal result elements vs. <, Abie Hamaoui | Thread | RE: [xsl] literal result elements v, Michael Kay |
[xsl] literal result elements vs. <, Abie Hamaoui | Date | Re: [xsl] pesky xmlns attributes, Wendell Piez |
Month |