|
Subject: Re: [xsl] literal result elements vs. <xsl:element> From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:38:08 +0100 |
The only time you need to use xsl:element is if you want to generate
the element name dynamically
you can go
<xsl:element name="{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}">....
but you can not go
<{concat($foo,substring(.,2))}> ...
The other use is as a way of avoiding namespace aliasing and generateing
elements in the xsl namespace
<xsl:element name="xsl:for-each">
generates an <xsl:for-each element but of course
<xsl:for-each
would be executed as xsl code.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] literal result elements vs. <, Abie Hamaoui | Thread | RE: [xsl] literal result elements v, Michael Kay |
| [xsl] literal result elements vs. <, Abie Hamaoui | Date | Re: [xsl] pesky xmlns attributes, Wendell Piez |
| Month |