RE: [xsl] What's the fastest XSL-FO renderer out there...

Subject: RE: [xsl] What's the fastest XSL-FO renderer out there...
From: David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:44:29 +0100
> Hammer.xml+Hammer.xsl --> Hammer.PDF
> (Hammer.xml and Hammer.xsl is distributed from RenderX site).

Surely a better, more direct comparison would only include the .fo file to
I.e. only time the formatter.

You should not compare two different xslt engines, especially when we know
that they can produce quite different results?

Regards DaveP


NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 


 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread