Subject: RE: [xsl] specifying html doctypes using xslt literal result stylesheets From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:29:41 +0100 |
> Perhaps it isn't widely used because it is broken...? > Why is it in the spec? It is also in the 2.0 > spec... It's not very useful, but it isn't broken. It's in the 2.0 spec because it was in the 1.0 spec. You can't just take things out because you don't think they are very useful. Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] specifying html doctypes , S. Alexander Jacobso | Thread | RE: [xsl] specifying html doctypes , S. Alexander Jacobso |
Re: [xsl] Re: checking for a node i, Jarkko . Moilanen | Date | RE: [xsl] checking for a node in th, Michael Kay |
Month |