|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors - W3C schemas only? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 29 Feb 2004 08:01:48 +0000 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael> What's more, the conformance rules are written in an
Michael> "all-or-nothing" style. You either support all these
Michael> schema-aware features (import-schema, validate, node
Michael> annotations) or you support none of them. The XSL WG
Michael> deliberately tried to avoid having products that
Michael> cherry-picked the individual features they wanted to
Michael> implement.
You mean like Saxon 7.8 does? :-)
I refer to the annotating of attributes as xs:IDREF, which is
specifically disallowed by the standard for Basic XSLT processors, and
seems to make it impossible for a Basic XSLT processor to be fully
backwards compatible with XSLT 1.0.
Which I find objectionable.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams |
| Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams | Date | Re: [xsl] Schema-aware processors -, Colin Paul Adams |
| Month |