Subject: RE: [xsl] Unknown variables in XPATH (2.0) From: "Michael Kay" <mhk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:31:29 -0000 |
# # Yes, but that isn't what is wanted by the user in question. # It's a case of boolean-valued environment variables, to indicate # certain products are installed. Most people don't bother to define # such an environment variable on their system, to indicate they haven't # installed the product, so false() is the natural default in this case. It would be much better to meet that requirement through an extension function xx:is-installed('product-name'). Michael Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Unknown variables in XPAT, Colin Paul Adams | Thread | [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementation o, Thomas J. Sebestyen |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementati, Thomas J. Sebestyen | Date | RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 and implementati, Michael Kay |
Month |