|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional language From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 30 Mar 2004 18:12:14 +0100 |
>>>>> "Kenny" == Kenny Akridge <kenny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Kenny> I'm just curious- what specifically makes you believe that
Kenny> XPath is not functional? And when I say XPath, I am
Kenny> referring to the spec, not an implementation.
Because:
a) You cannot define functions within XPath, and
b) You cannot pass function definitions as arguments to functions.
Either is sufficient.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, M. David Peterson | Thread | [xsl] Sorting order, Shashi . Bhushan |
| RE: [xsl] XPath is NOT a functional, Kenny Akridge | Date | [xsl] new thread... difference betw, Shashi Kiran |
| Month |