|
Subject: Re: [xsl] killing xslt From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 12:05:25 +0100 |
You may find it easier to convert to J#, the tools for doing that seem more reliable. That's how the MS team moved Quake to .NET.
With a little software development experience, I'd suggest a port of the current Saxon would be a sufficient challenge?
Without a doubt this is going to be something that I believe will be just about every combination of enlightenment and frustration with everything in between. So I agree, phase 1: porting existing Saxon 7.9.x to C#/.NET will be sufficient to keep myself and Pieter busy for quite some time. And never missing an opportunity to reach out for more support, please contact Pieter (mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx) if you would like to extend any level of development effort towards this project.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] killing xslt, M. David Peterson | Thread | RE: [xsl] killing xslt, M. David Peterson |
| RE: [xsl] multiple xsl:param, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] killing xslt, M. David Peterson |
| Month |