| Subject: Large transforms (was Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms) From: Kevin Jones <kjones@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 20:57:53 +0100 | 
Thanks to the people who responded to my original post. I have to say I was a little disappointed/puzzled by the lack of responses. I am not sure why this was but I can only assume there is either little interest in transforms over the few 100MB size or little interest in discussing the problems this presents. It is not often I get the chance to discuss stuff we are doing on the processor for obvious commercial reasons. I thought this subject might be suitable for a wider audience as anecdotal evidence suggests that large XML file usage is growing and and along with that comes some expectation that tools can cope. Regards, Kev
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] GByte Transforms, Kevin Jones | Thread | Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Wendell Piez | 
| Re: [xsl] Parsing a string, Jeff Kenton | Date | Re: [xsl] Large transforms (was Re:, Wendell Piez | 
| Month |