Subject: Re: [xsl] grouping + global variable (?) (was re: regexs, grouping (?) and XSLT2?) From: Deirdre Saoirse Moen <deirdre@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:15:17 -0700 (PDT) |
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Wendell Piez wrote: > 1. Poor man's version: run two stylesheets in succession[...]. > 2. Extended XSLT 1.0[...]. > 3. XSLT 2.0 -- same as 2, except no extension function is needed: > it'll happen transparently. > 4. External pipeline support: many environments, and some processors, > allow you to chain stylesheets directly, thereby eliminating the need > to write out the intermediate result as a file (as option 1 does). > This is the in-between solution. For example, Saxon has a > saxon:next-in-chain attribute you can use on xsl:output. I'm trying to figure out a better way of slicing the problem I've been working on. Essentially, the workflow is thus: 1) Author creates a text file. Said file has minimal markup such as _underline_ and *boldface*, with a blank line between paragraphs. There's some other specialized stuff, like pulling the author information and byline. While that's all fixed now, I'm working on something that'll allow some substitution. For example, some markets want Times instead of Courier, so I'm going to make that replaceable in the XSL stylesheet. 2) Currently, a perl script transforms said text file into XML. This is the part I'd most prefer to change. :) 3) For a novel, there's also an additional step where each chapter's XML file is included into a wrapper XML file that is transformed into one big novel PDF. 4) Currently, an XSL stylesheet + XSL-FO transforms said XML file into PDF. (for the curious: http://www.extraneous.org/wiki/ProseML) That all works like a charm. But I've been thinking, based on the comments from the list, that a better process might be eliminating the perl script entirely. I'm not sure I'd want to eliminate the intermediate XML file, though. There have been times when I've needed to tweak it. For example, I have old files with smart quotes not saved in UTF-8, and the perl script barfs on UTF-8 files, so I do the XML conversion, open the file and re-save the XML as UTF-8. Option 3 seems to be ruled out based on my current toolchain (apache-FOP), which probably eliminates #2 as well. (I could easily be wrong on this) Options 1 and 4 seem most like what the current process is. Currently, a new XML file is generated only if the timestamp is less than the timestamp of the text file it's transformed from. So, my question (you knew there was one): can someone give me a description of how to accomplish #4, given the workflow I've got, using something like Saxon? I see that it's an XSLT processor, but I'm don't get the map of how all the pieces fit together. Right now, I know (after having looked) that I'm using xalan for the simple reason that it came with my apache-fop install. I'd also eventually like to get a decent RTF output. Standard manuscript prose is not terribly complex, so something that supported basic features should suffice for that. Unfortunately, the commercial options are too expensive for the intended audience. Is jfop likely to be my best available option? -- _Deirdre web: http://deirdre.net blog: http://deirdre.org/blog/ yarn: http://fuzzyorange.com cat's blog: http://fuzzyorange.com/vsd/ "Memes are a hoax! Pass it on!"
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] grouping + global variabl, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] grouping + global variabl, Wendell Piez |
[xsl] Advice on selecting a process, Lisa Bos | Date | Re: [xsl] Advice on selecting a pro, M. David Peterson |
Month |