Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges

Subject: Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:22:47 -0400
On Aug 31, 2004, at 5:11 AM, David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I'm not sure I'd even chase such an irregular lot Bruce!

       :200-204
yet
       :101-8
and
       :321-28

Somewhat illogical?

I've always been suspicious of people recommending
the Chicago manual of style.

there's a whole bunch of reasons!

Yes, true, but then you run into a fascist copy editor at some journal publisher who insists you follow it.


I haven't even considered whether there are different algorithms for different core styles (apa, mla, etc.), which there no doubt is!

Bruce

Current Thread