Subject: Re: [xsl] collapsing number ranges From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 05:22:47 -0400 |
I'm not sure I'd even chase such an irregular lot Bruce!
:200-204 yet :101-8 and :321-28
Somewhat illogical?
I've always been suspicious of people recommending the Chicago manual of style.
there's a whole bunch of reasons!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, David . Pawson | Thread | RE: [xsl] collapsing number ranges, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Re: Replacing values, David Sinclair | Date | RE: [xsl] Multiple matches against , Andrew Welch |
Month |