|
Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having From: cknell@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:00:45 -0400 |
Yes.
select="two[*]"
--
Charles Knell
cknell@xxxxxxxxxx - email
-----Original Message-----
From: john-xsl-list <john-xsl-list@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:49:46 -0400
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL having
I want to process all second level nodes that have children. Is there an
XPath to retrieve all nodes having children, or do I add logic to ignore
nodes without children after the XPath has already been evaluated?
<one>
<two>
<three>
</two>
<two />
<two>
<three>
</two>
</one>
Is there an XPath that will only return the first and third instances of
<two>?
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, john-xsl-list | Thread | [xsl] Alternative to xsl:choose?, john-xsl-list |
| Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, Francesco Barresi | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL equivalent of SQL hav, G. Ken Holman |
| Month |