| 
 
Subject: Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sibling - only print *first* in  sorted list?? From: "Hardy Merrill" <HMerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:38:51 -0400  | 
I like the idea, but I don't know how to do that.  Can you take pity on
an XSL newbie and kindly show me how to do that?
>>> marvin.the.cynical.robot@xxxxxxxxx 10/12/04 10:09AM >>>
Hi,
    Why dont you write a second XSL program and have it operate on the
sorted output of the first? The document order for the
preceding-sibling in the second program will be the right order that
you need.
Regards,
Kenneth
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:55:29 -0400, Hardy Merrill
<hmerrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was trying to use "preceding-sibling" to figure out if the
previous
> sibling ***in sorted order*** had the same district, but I've now
> figured out after reading on the subject that "preceding-sibling"
does
> not operate on the sorted tree - instead it operates on the original
> tree that is in "document" order.
> 
> I'd like to use the best/most efficient method to solve this problem
-
> the muncheon technique using keys if possible.  Can I do that, and
if
> so, how?
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen | Thread | Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen | 
| Re: [xsl] sorting and preceding-sib, Kenneth Stephen | Date | Re: [xsl] Checking for instance of , Jeni Tennison | 
| Month |