|
Subject: Re: [xsl] position and grouping? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 23:29:35 +0100 |
> So it seems when I use the "position()" test above, I am not just > testing the position of the name within the record, but (also?) the > name within a group of records. Can someone clarify this? beware foreign terminoligy as it leads to confusion (on my part at least) XSLT and XML don't have records. position() _never_ relates to the location of a node in a source tree. It always refers to a position in a current node list (or sequence in 2.0). That is if you select a node with self:: it always has position() =1 even if it's the 1001 child of some parent. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] position and grouping?, Bruce D'Arcus | Thread | Re: [xsl] position and grouping?, Bruce D'Arcus |
| Re: [xsl] Fun with xsl:number and a, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [xsl] Fun with xsl:number and a, David Carlisle |
| Month |