Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt2 general steps. From: "Pawson, David" <David.Pawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:36:43 -0000 |
-----Original Message----- From: Jeni Tennison There's one restriction, though, in that general steps must return nodes (rather than atomic values). This restriction is lifted only for last step in a path, which can return atomic values instead (though it's not permitted for it to return atomic values in some cases and nodes in other cases). In other words, you can do things like: keyword/lower-case(.) but you can't do: keyword/lower-case(.)/substring-before(., '-') Jeni, you say general steps must return nodes except for the last step? This latter 'last step' returns an atomic value as I see it (a string). What is wrong with it? regards DaveP -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Enclosing following-sibli, Jarno.Elovirta | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt2 general steps., Geert Josten |
RE: [xsl] characters in xsl, Pawson, David | Date | Re: [xsl] xslt2 general steps., Geert Josten |
Month |