[xsl] doc() and temp trees as xinclude processor?

Subject: [xsl] doc() and temp trees as xinclude processor?
From: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:56:03 -0500
I just had a thought after working with the doc() function in XSLT 2.0:

Instead of using an external xinclude processor to resolve xincludes, why not just do all in XSLT by using a temporary tree?

Bruce

Current Thread