Subject: Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 15 Nov 2004 18:55:34 +0000 |
>>>>> "David" == M David Peterson <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: David> Colin, any comments in regards to the specific platforms in David> which you feel are best suited to run your Eiffel based David> XSLT 2.0 processor. Any except JVM. Reasons for not suitable on JVM are: 1) Saxon is more complete in most respects. 2) More seriously, I don't think SmartEiffel 1.0's compile_to_java command works, and none of the other compilers target the JVM, so it would be necessary to do JNI programming, or somethin glike that. David> XSLT 2.0 processor. Is this a Basic or Schema Aware David> implementation? If Basic are you planning a Schema Aware David> version? Basic. No current plans for Schema awarness - I'd have to write a schema processor first. -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] 'nother xslt2 engine, M. David Peterson | Date | [xsl] mathML2SVG, Matthew L. Avizinis |
Month |