RE: [xsl] mathML2SVG

Subject: RE: [xsl] mathML2SVG
From: Pieter Reint Siegers Kort <pieter.siegers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:55:21 -0600
Why not create a project on SF.net? All would be benefitted with that move,
I think.

Apart from that, did you also post your offer on the SVG list monitored by
Kurt Gagle?

A bit getting OT, but anyway, here it goes, for the good cause :-)

Cheers,
<prs/> 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew L. Avizinis [mailto:mla@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:39 AM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] mathML2SVG

I sent this yesterday, but apparently it failed. so here it is again

ok, then.  I'll put the stuff together.  However, I think I'll let you folks
peruse the code first before any other announcement -- there're probably a
good number of defects or code that can be better written and additionally
I'm a stinker when it comes to commentary, for the most part.
Anyhow, is there a preferred method of posting here? some of the files are
fairly long.  should I just provide a bunch of http links to a set of files
or should I post several messages here with the contents of each file
included as text and notated where the start and end is for each file?  In
either case it will be Wednesday or Thursday before I'll have time to put it
up.  I hope nobody turns blue holding their breath...  :) Finally, the
reason I developed the thing was so that my company could better render
equations/formulae in pdf format with FOP.  Works for most cases we use
around here.
Matthew

David Carlisle wrote:

>>   Anyone here interested in a set of templates that converts a fairly 
>>good subset of presentation mathML to SVG format using a fixed width 
>>font?
>>    
>>
>
>Me!
>
>you could announce on www-math@xxxxxx as well, and we could add a link 
>on the mathml software page at w3c.
>
>Copyright and licence issues: I'm not a lwayer as the saying goes, but 
>it's generally best to put something explicit in the file, GPL if you 
>are happy with that or perhaps the W3C's software licence which is 
>rather more easy going than GPL. See for example the licence comments 
>in the MathML stylesheets at http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL which are 
>copyright me, but licenced under the W3C licence (which means, 
>basically you can do what you want within reason)
>
>David
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>_ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is 
>powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus 
>service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
>http://www.star.net.uk
>_______________________________________________________________________
>_

Current Thread