Subject: RE: [xsl] Separating XSLT 1 and 2 help? From: Mulberry Technologies List Owner <xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 18:49:30 -0500 |
Now there's some common sense comment but is also taken from the point of view of the others that responded - I said "specific".
I know you did. I understood your suggestion, I thought about it, and I disagree. Discussions on XSL-List serve at least two functions; the original poster gets a question answered and other people learn what sorts of questions people have (and by implication, the things they are doing with XSL) and how the questions can be addressed. A list specific to XSLT 2, that addressed only questions that the poster knew were about XSLT 2, might serve the first function very well, but I think it would erode the ability of the list to serve the second function.
This second function, general education of people interested in XSL, seems be a very valuable function of XSL-List; I get messages from lurkers regularly who tell me how much they learn simply by reading the list.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Separating XSLT 1 and 2 h, Pieter Reint Siegers | Thread | Re: [xsl] Separating XSLT 1 and 2 h, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] generating human-readable, Brian Chrisman | Date | Re: [xsl] generating human-readable, David Carlisle |
Month |