Subject: Re: [xsl] implementation of xslt 2.0 working draft From: Midsummer Sun <midsummer.sun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:58:11 +0530 |
I have read the discussion to which Michael Kay pointed. I do agree to the opinion expressed in that thread to large extent. but my personal opinion is (in the order below) - If your project *really* cares about standards, you must use XSLT 1.0. As it is a stable spec and lot of stable tools are available which conform with it 100%. You would benifit if you need to change vendors during your products lifetime. At this stage(when XSLT 2.0 is WD), I would suggest using XSLT 2.0 when - You need to solve certain problems which cannot be solved using XSLT 1.0 (there are many problems possible!) - Or you need compact way to write stylesheets. I feel XSLT 2.0 allows to solve the same problem with fewer lines of codes than XSLT 1.0 . This increases programmer productivity. Which ultimately will save cost for your client. When XSLT 2.0 becomes the Recommendation, I would certainly select XSLT 2.0 rather than XSLT 1.0 best regards, On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:55:44 -0800 (PST), meesala dinesh <meesala74@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > How reliable it is to adapt to xslt 2.0 as is > still under working draft?. > should we wait till it is available as a > recommendation or proceed using it with saxon > processor?. > I would really appreciate special comments from > w3.org/TR/xslt editors. > Currently the request proposal to architect on > migrating to xslt 2.0 is on hold in my project. > > comments please ASAP. > > thanks. > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] implementation of xslt 2., Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Is this possible in XML/XSL?, Jason Trépanier |
[xsl] Slightly OT: Formal XSD schem, Eliot Kimber | Date | Re: [xsl] Can i use apply-templates, Chris |
Month |