Subject: Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents for equality - a solution From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 05:51:35 +1000 |
Hi Wendell, > Hey Dimitre, > > At 07:05 AM 3/31/2005, you wrote: > >In this concrete case "document equality" remains undefined. > >Therefore, the problem based on it is also undefined. > > I'm with you so far. > > > Any activity to > >solve an undefined problem is groundless and imaginary -- something > >like hallucination. > > I can accept this provisionally, leaving aside a discussion of what we > should mean by "groundless", "imaginary", and "hallucination". (Though > perhaps not on XSL-List. :-) Whether any such activity is a waste of time > is, however, another question. I cannot see where I said it was waste of time ? > As is whether this doesn't describe most of > what we human animals do -- try to solve undefined problems. (Sometimes > this activity might lead to defining a problem and solving it, after all. :-) Exactly. The main problem in this thread is to define the problem. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents f, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Testing 2 XML documents f, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Scope of xml source, incl, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | RE: [xsl] Scope of xml source, incl, Michael Kay |
Month |