| Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:28:15 +0100 | 
  Actually the equivalence is to:
     <xsl:for-each select="$in">
       <xsl:sort select="."/>
       <xsl:sequence select="."/>
     </xsl:for-each>
  since no copying is involved.
ah yes, thanks.
Any reason why xsl:sequence doesn't take xsl:sort
so the equivalence would be
   <xsl:sequence select="$in">
     <xsl:sort select="."/>
   </xsl:sequence>
 
which would I think mean that xsl:perform-sort was identical to
xsl:sequence?
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0), Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] math return result problem, 04083259 | 
| RE: [xsl] xsl:perform-sort (in 2.0), Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Bedtime reading..., Pieter Reint Siegers | 
| Month |