| Subject: Re: [xsl] Test For Numeric Values? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:52:11 +1000 | 
> i know its late in the day re XSLT / XPATH 2.0 drafts, > > but doesnt this scenario sort of 'scream out' for a boolean function > that tests for type, both basic (node, string, number) and schema ? > I would "scream" for an xdt:numeric type. Having such type have an immediate positive effect -- it will significantly reduce the size of the F & O spec. I realize that there might be different interpretations -- what I propose is not a common base type (that probably is not possible to "insert" in the type hierarchy), but just a convenient "union" of all numeric types. I tried to look for problems that this would create -- couldn't find any. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev.
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Test For Numeric Values?, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] testing for string and number, James Fuller | 
| [xsl] list of actual attributes?, Per Jessen | Date | Re: [xsl] list of actual attribute, David Carlisle | 
| Month |