| Subject: RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output encoding ? From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:17:07 -0600 | 
JBryant@xxxxxxxxx writes: > Then I'd like to ask that it remain implementation-specific, so that I can > keep getting plain text when I run my tools from the command line. I don't > need a bunch of goobledygook cluttering up my debugging messages. I have the opposite problem: my debugging messages contain goobledygook (i.e. '<' in place of '<') even though my stylesheet serializes the result document as <xsl:output method="text"/>. -- Kevin Rodgers
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, JBryant | Thread | RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, Michael Kay | 
| RE: [xsl] [XSLT] xsl:message output, JBryant | Date | Re: [xsl] Compatibility question, António Mota | 
| Month |