RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Wa

Subject: RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST)
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:47:42 +0100

> Anyway it would be interesting to see some more detailed study about 
> integration of subsetted RNG into XSLT 2.0.

It would indeed. Nice to know there's no danger of running out of things to
do.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued) Dimitre Novatchev - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:48:18 +1000 Dimitre Novatchev - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:50:11 +1000 Michael Kay - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:08:20 +0100 Jirka Kosek - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 13:14:44 +0200 Michael Kay - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:47:42 +0100 <= Dimitre Novatchev - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:00:38 +1000 Michael Kay - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:38:38 +0100 Eric van der Vlist - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:48:41 +0200 M. David Peterson - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:35:52 -0600

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- which is more elegant? (Was: Re: [xsl] mixing it up: REST+XML Namespaces + XLST), (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Jirka Kosek	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 1.0 -- w, Dimitre Novatchev
[xsl] Upgrading Saxon XSLT 1.0 supp, G. Ken Holman	Date	RE: RE: REx6: [xsl] GMT to BST conv, cknell
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home