Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images
From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:23:08 +0200

David Carlisle wrote:

The url('  ...') is boilerplate that unfortunately has to be there as
the WG were having an off-day and copied CSS syntax into XSL FO


I actually found this useful, it simplifies the development of
transformations from (X)HTML to XSLFO and vice versa quite a bit.

If they only had made this a bit more explicit, rather than suggesting
in section 5 of the spec "there's only one grammar for generating valid
values for FO properties..."

J.Pietschmann

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, (continued) craig webber - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:43:06 +0000 David Carlisle - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:48:11 +0100 G. Ken Holman - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:13:46 -0400 David Carlisle - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:45:55 +0100 J.Pietschmann - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:23:08 +0200 <= David Carlisle - Tue, 19 Apr 2005 22:03:42 +0100 J.Pietschmann - Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:24:01 +0200 JBryant - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:27:02 -0500 JBryant - Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:34:16 -0500

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle
Re: [Fwd: [xsl] Upgrading Saxon XSL, M. David Peterson	Date	RE: RE: RE: REx6: [xsl] GMT to BST , cknell
	Month