|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode characters? From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 06 May 2005 11:57:16 +0100 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for
>> safety?
>> >
>> > Neither is completely safe of course,
>>
Michael> The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16,
Michael> anything else is optional.
Michael> I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this
Michael> encoding. The differences are immaterial (different names
Michael> for some of the characters, I believe) but I prefer
Michael> international standards as a matter of principle.
Shouldn't this be ISO-646-US?
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Andrew Welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Edward Bryant |
| RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] RSS feeds and disable-out, David Carlisle |
| Month |