Re: [xsl] Better include them in the XSLT 2.0 spec (Was: Re: [xsl] Time for an exslt for 2.0?)

[Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> "Dimitre" == Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Dimitre> I was talking not about "functions" but about
    Dimitre> xsl:function

    Dimitre> Does it make a difference now?

    Colin> I don't see it.  You originally said:

    Colin> "xsl:function -s with side effects should not have been
    Colin> allowed -- in the first place."

    Colin> But that is not sufficient to guarentee that f($x) is f($x)
    Colin> always returns true().

    Colin> Oh yes it is!

Oh no it isn't!
I've degenerated into pantomime.
I shall now go for a walk, until my head is clear.
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire