| 
 
Subject: RE: [xsl] document('') and URIResolver From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 14:29:06 +0100  | 
> While in principle it would be possible for a system to special case
> this argument to document() and instead of reparsing the XML just to
> re-use some in-memory tree constructed when the stylesheet was parsed,
> this might be difficult in practice for a system to achieve as for
> example the default white space stripping rules are different, and a
> system might have done other in-place changes to teh stylesheet tree,
> for example related to processing xsl:include or code-re-writing in a
> code optimiser...
Yes; in fact, the processor might well not have the original source
stylesheet tree still available at run-time, and it almost certainly won't
have all the original whitespace. There are also complications because
document("") does NOT select the current stylesheet module; it selects the
resource whose URI is the same as the base URI of the element containing the
call on document() - which might not be the same, for example, if the
stylesheet module was assembled from external XML entities.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
| Current Thread | 
|---|
  | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] document('') and URIResol, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] document('') and URIResol, jpk | 
| Re: [xsl] building path expressions, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] XSL - Switching Order Element, craig webber | 
| Month |