|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows? From: Kevin Rodgers <kevin.rodgers@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:48:15 -0600 |
M. David Peterson writes: > - Capturing the commandline output, again, is really quite simple. > But what next? The only way to chain together a transformation would > be a to first save the transformation to a file, run another > commandline transformaton with that saved file, and so on and so > forth. Again, a performance bottleneck. ... > Any other questions? Is there really no way to pipeline processes on Windows, like with a pipe on Unix? -- Kevin Rodgers
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, M. David Peterson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Robert Bachmann |
| RE: [xsl] Dynamically controlling s, Aron Bock | Date | Re: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Robert Bachmann |
| Month |