Subject: RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:54:43 +0100 |
> HTTP requests work but performance would be hurt. > > It's actually quite simple. I'm using a process class which > allows me to > capture StdOut and StdErr, and that runs a process in the > background. The > background process can be anything that runs via a command > line, I thought about this a little more. For a single one-off request, spawning a process and running the processor from the command line is probably quite viable. For any kind of production service, where the same stylesheet is going to be executed repeatedly, or where many different transformations are going to be run, a server architecture in which the server can reuse resources when handling multiple requests is going to be far better. And a server architecture based on HTTP is probably as good as any other. So your statement "performance would be hurt" is neither right nor wrong: it's just assuming a very particular kind of workload. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Pieter Reint Siegers |
RE: [xsl] Saxon for windows?, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Finding unique columns f, Michael Kay |
Month |