Subject: Re: [xsl] Recursive Template ?? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:41:44 +1000 |
On 6/3/05, Bovy, Stephen J <STEPHEN.Bovy@xxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks every-one !! > > Does it incur a heavy performance penalty ??? Compared to what? For some problems it may be very difficult (if at all possible) to have a non-recursive solution. Also, often the non-recursive solution (if such exists) is much more complex than the recursive one, more difficult to maintain and its correctness more difficult to prove. Why is this so? The answer is that the object on which an XSLT transformation operates is the tree. A tree is a recursive structure, having a recursive definition. Not surprisingly, recursion happens to be a natural technique for processing recursive structures. There are ways of writing recursive templates and functions that do not incur *heavy* performance penalty (if any at all), such as: DVC (divide and conquer) and Tail Recursion. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Recursive Template ??, Bovy, Stephen J | Thread | RE: [xsl] Recursive Template ??, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] spacing issue, Michael Kay | Date | RE: [xsl] Recursive Template ??, Michael Kay |
Month |