Subject: RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transform" became the term for the type ofthing XSLT does? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:32:34 +0100 |
> I note that the XSLT2 spec calls things > modules quite often (perhaps pointing the way towards the > issues raised > in the recent thread on separate compilation) although it always > prefixes "module" with "stylesheet" so isn't really suggesting xslt > module as an alternative to xslt stylesheet. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#dt-stylesheet-module > [Definition: A stylesheet consists of one or more stylesheet modules, > each one forming all or part of an XML document.] > The 2.0 spec is in fact very careful to distinguish the terms "stylesheet" and "stylesheet module", unlike the 1.0 spec which used them interchangeably. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Anybody know when "transf, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Anybody know when "transf, Andrew Welch |
[xsl] Finding the Undefined Element, Arulxml | Date | [xsl] A tricky problem, Carlos M. S. Bento N |
Month |