|
Subject: Re: [xsl] () equivalent to () ? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:06:51 +0100 |
> Is the empty sequence equal to itself?
XPath2 has several notions of equality (=, eq, is, deep-equal)
(
concat("[",()=(),"]"),
concat("[",() eq (),"]"),
concat("[",() is (),"]"),
concat("[",deep-equal((),()),"]")
)
evaluates to
[false] [] [] [true]
so the answer depends on what you mean by equality.
Note that
(
concat("[",()!=(),"]"),
concat("[",() ne (),"]")
)
evaluates to
[false] []
so () = () is false and () != () is also false. (This is teh same as in
xslt1 and is an automatic consequnce of teh implied existential
quantification in the definition of = and !=.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] () equivalent to () ?, Frans Englich | Thread | Re: [xsl] () equivalent to () ?, Frans Englich |
| [xsl] () equivalent to () ?, Frans Englich | Date | Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, David Carlisle |
| Month |