Subject: Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:result-document From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:18:32 +0100 |
> The actual xslt I've been hacking has an x:replace() > function replacing certain characters (u/v i/y thorn/th) for Note that the xslt2 way of doing comparisons that are insensitive to such differences is really to specify a collation that does the right thing. However if saxon doesn't provide (or give acces to a java) collation that does the right thing for you that would mean writing (er something) in java that saxon sees as a collation, in which case you might find it easier to do a string replace within xslt. (I probably would, but my xslt is rather better than by java). David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, James Cummings | Thread | Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, James Cummings |
Re: [xsl] alphabetic set of xsl:res, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] () equivalent to () ?, Michael Kay |
Month |