Subject: Re: [xsl] Multiple source documents From: Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 11:43:54 +0200 |
Hi David, Thanks for reminding me that I could give a look at my processor extensions! I'll have a look at it. Either way, it might well be my design which is not the right one either :) Thanks again - Sylvain Selon David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > If my XML documents were stored as files on the disk I know I could work > > with > > > the document() function in my XSL transform document. > > > > > > But they are not on disck ad will be passed to my XSLT processor as > > strings. No > > > does it mean I have to concatenate both of them in a meta XML document or > > is > > > there a way to process both of them in the same transform? > > The only standard way to access an XML document passed as a string is to > use document() together with the data: URI type, although in practice > data isn't widely supported and so many systems offer extension > functions to parse strings. As such what you can do depends entirely on > the extension function or APi you are using to parse the strings. > > David > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: > http://www.star.net.uk > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Multiple source documents, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Multiple source documents, Sylvain Hellegouarch |
Re: [xsl] Multiple source documents, Sylvain Hellegouarch | Date | Re: [xsl] Variable Problems, Joris Gillis |
Month |