Subject: RE: [xsl] Tree Fragment versus Node Set From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:14:46 +0100 |
> is there a > better way to do this? No, in 1.0 there isn't. You sometimes need to create result tree fragments. But don't do it when you don't need to. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin L. Cobb [mailto:kevin.cobb@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 15 September 2005 15:33 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [xsl] Tree Fragment versus Node Set > > I realize that its always better to form my variables into node-sets > versus tree fragments by using the select attribute whenever possible. > But, can one ALWAYS prevent (in XSLT 1.0) making a tree fragment? For > example, if building my variable comes from a template call, > is there a > better way to do this? > > <xsl:variable name="myVar"> > <xsl:call-template name="buildMyVariableNode"> > <xsl:with-param name="arg1" select="'test1'"/> > <xsl:with-param name="arg2" select="'test2'"/> > </xsl:call-template> > </xsl:variable> > > -Thanks, > > Kevin
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tree Fragment versus Node, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Tree Fragment versus Node, Kevin L. Cobb |
Re: [xsl] check is a file exists us, andrew welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Replacing HTML in my XML , Michael Kay |
Month |