|
Subject: [xsl] Performance From: "Khorasani, Houman" <houman_khorasani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:38:47 +0100 |
I just have noticed This way of writing the code is much faster count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='add']) than this way: count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and @action='add']) Why is that? And how do I write this piece of code like the above in the 'faster' way? count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber') and (@action='default' or @action='add')]) Because this would imply I had two 'and' instead of one 'and' and one 'or' correct? count(*[starts-with(name(),'DGBUIMSNNumber')][@action='default'][@action ='add']) Regards Houman
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Problem with Saxon 7.9.1 , Olaf Meske | Thread | RE: [xsl] Performance, Michael Kay |
| [xsl] Problem with Saxon 7.9.1 xsl:, Olaf Meske | Date | RE: [xsl] Problem with Saxon 7.9.1 , Michael Kay |
| Month |