|
Subject: Re: [xsl] What do you call a stylesheet that doesn't require an input XML? From: JBryant@xxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:53:44 -0500 |
How about these?
Lazy (won't do nothin' unless someone gives me some XML)
Ambitious (gonna go get my own XML!)
Snobby (too good to associate with other files)
:D
Or you could go with
External (XML source is defined outside the stylesheet)
Internal (XML source is defined inside the stylesheet)
Stand-alone (doesn't need an XML source)
I'm a little uncomfortable with Internal versus External, since I have
written my stylesheets that use the collection feature to get XML source
documents such that they take a path parameter. So there's still some
information coming from outside the stylesheet. Also, the terms are
generic enough to be confusing.
There's also
Uncollected
Collected
Stand-alone
Just some ideas.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
10/27/2005 09:02 AM
Please respond to
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [xsl] What do you call a stylesheet that doesn't require an input XML?
>>>>> "Andrew" == andrew welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Andrew> traditional kind of transform as you can easily divide
Andrew> stylesheets into the 2 types of processing models - those
Andrew> with the XML supplied, and those where the stylesheet
Andrew> fetches the XML itself without an initial XML.
There's a third kind - those that do not reference an XML document at
all.
There's quite a few of these in the test suite for FXSL.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] What do you call a styles, andrew welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] What do you call a styles, andrew welch |
| Re: [xsl] What do you call a styles, Jon Gorman | Date | [xsl] Sibling sort after grouping, C. Zarate |
| Month |