|
Subject: Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></empty? From: Eric Scheid <eric.scheid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:58:40 +1100 |
On 12/12/05 11:02 AM, "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So, it would seem the serialiser I'm using is defective, yes?
>> Sadly, I don't
>> think I have a choice in the matter, since I'm using the built in XSLT
>> functionality of Filemaker.
>
> Start by finding out which XSLT processor Filemaker is using:
>
> <xsl:comment>Generated using:
> <xsl:value-of select="system-property('xsl:vendor')"/>
> </xsl:comment>
<!--Generated using: Apache Software Foundation-->
feh.
doing a search at filemaker.com turned up references to "XALAN-based" and
"XERCES-based".
> Don't this tool permit you to change the XSLT processor to be used?
> So you could use a correct implementation.
sadly no.
e.
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, drkm |
| RE: [xsl] <empty /> vs <empty></emp, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] XSL to generate required outp, Amrit Pal Singh |
| Month |