|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Un-cdata-section-elements From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:31:44 +1100 |
On 3/22/06, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is there any reason why you need to generate xhtml rather than html?
Only because I wanted to be rad and cool and play with the other kool
standards kids. Seriously, though, I have a whole site in beautiful
valid XHTML 1.0 strict and I seriously feel reluctant to change all
that for a teeny bit of JS. Maybe I should just give that even manager
a try instead. :)
> If you generate XHTML pages you should use an xhtml mime type (eg
> application/html+xml) and only serve it to systems that understand xhtml
> (which rules out IE).
The '// CDATA' best-practice rule is of course inclusive of all
browsers, new and old, and I would have liked to play it that way. Oh
well.
Alex
--
"Ultimately, all things are known because you want to believe you know."
- Frank Herbert
__ http://shelter.nu/ __________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Un-cdata-section-elements, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] FW: XSLT 2.0 unit testing uti, Weston, Toby |
| RE: [xsl] Re: Un-cdata-section-elem, Nathan Young -X \(na | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Un-cdata-section-elem, Alexander Johannesen |
| Month |