Subject: Re: [xsl] amp symbols From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 14:21:18 +0100 |
> I have a similar situation. The people that I am sending XML files > to, require that entities be used for certain characters. I maintain a DTD that has perhaps more character entities than any other "public" DTD (MathML has more than 2000 entities for characters) but still, I question whether there is ever a need to have such a character reference in generated files (such as the output of xslt). Entities for characters are really there to ease hand authoring. If people said they needed attributes to be marked up using ' instead of " then you would be in a simialr position, the XSLT spec gives no control over this, so you have the option of a) educate your users that XML does not distinguish between these markup forms, so they should not either. or, if your users are unwilling to be educated, or in a position of power, such they may choose not to listen, or if you just want to be kind to them anyway, b) post process the XSLT output with a NON-XML tool such as perl or sed to edit the markup appropriately. XSLT1 does give disable-output-escaping that can be used sometimes as an alternative to (b) but it's not usually a good idea, and expplictly an optional feature in XSLt1 and explictly deprecated in XSLT2. If you really must do something like this, and can use XSLT2, character maps provide a much better mechanism architecturally. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] amp symbols, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] amp symbols, Chad Chelius |
Re: [xsl] amp symbols, andrew welch | Date | [xsl] command line XPath data extra, Bru, Pierre |
Month |