Subject: Re: [xsl] amp symbols From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 10:16:14 +0100 |
Michael wrote > Well, we got the doctype-system and doctype-public added to xsl:output, but > the idea of a processor reading the DTD to extract the entity definitions > was never pursued. No, but actually xslt2 character maps do more or less the same thing so long as you do a "one-off" conversion of the DTD entity definitions into a character map specifying the reverse transformation back from characters to entity references. Or as in the case of http://www.w3.org/2003/entities/iso9573-2003doc/overview.html generate the character map and the dtd at the same time. So in the 7 and a bit years since I sent that message to xsl-list we get to a point where xslt2 is getting to the "almost final" stages of the REC process, and provides the features needed, and the STIX font submission that I mentioned is also almost there with http://www.stixfonts.org/ now saying "Final Glyph Delivery Expected by End of June" and full release by December. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] amp symbols, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] amp symbols, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] How Move Footnote in Para, Mukul Gandhi | Date | [xsl] Theory question: Node trees a, Phillip B Oldham |
Month |