Subject: RE: [xsl] Obtaining Graphic File Widths From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:57:24 +0100 |
> That doesn't sound compliant. What processor is that? > document() shouldn't care what the name of the file is, as > long as it parses (and unless your SVG is broken, it does). Actually, the implementation can be as choosy as it likes about which documents it is prepared to read. It can certainly depend on the protocol (URI scheme) and it can also depend on the media type. I think it would be a little unusual for a file to be rejected because it has the wrong media type, but it's not beyond the bounds of possibility. Rejecting files that have no "x" in the name would be even more unusual, but not non-conformant. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Obtaining Graphic File W, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Obtaining Graphic File W, Frans Englich |
[xsl] Trying to figure out the chil, Austin, Darrel | Date | RE: [xsl] Trying to figure out the , Michael Kay |
Month |