Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total? From: Steve <subsume@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 14:13:03 -0400 |
Some things require longer explainations, as evidenced by the fact that this is still an open thread. Mine, while long, was pretty to the point.
Your insults and condescension have surely taken more of your precious time than the two minutes required of catching up on the initial discussion between M. Kay and I. Why not just sit this one out? Sometimes my little sister gets cranky, too, when she hasn't had a nap.
On 7/11/06, Steve <subsume@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > See incredibly well detailed problem description at top of thread. :o)
It is incredible, indeed.
Would be more appropriate if a source xml document was provided.
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, andrew welch |
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Steve | Date | [xsl] Keeping a running total? (Red, Steve |
Month |