Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total? From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:01:38 -0700 |
Okay, assuming the following input:
<xml> <factory x="A" capacity = "3" /> <factory x="B" capacity= "5" /> <factory x="C" capacity = "3" /> <factory x="D" capacity = "2" /> <factory x="E" capacity = "2" /> ...etc... </xml>
O(N) algorithm using recursion (not tested):
What about having a bigger than 2 (variable) number of quotas? How would your solution change to tackle this?
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
<xsl:template match="xml"> <xsl:apply-templates select="factory"> <xsl:with-param name="leftW" select="$Widget_quota" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftG" select="$Gadget_quota" /> <xsl:apply-templates select="factory"> </xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="factory"> <!-- running totals of capacity already used --> <xsl:param name="used">0</xsl:param> <xsl:param name="usedW">0</xsl:param> <xsl:param name="usedG">0</xsl:param> <!-- running totals of quota not used --> <xsl:param name="leftW">0</xsl:param> <xsl:param name="leftG">0</xsl:param>
<xsl:choose> <!-- Capacity used up, output used and move on --> <xsl:when test="(@capacity = $used)"> <out factory="{@x}" Widgets="{$usedW}" Gadgets="{$usedG}" Excess="{$used - ($usedW + $usedG)}" /> <xsl:apply-templates select="following-sibling::factory[1]"> <xsl:with-param name="leftW" select="$leftW" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftG" select="$leftG" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="not($leftW = 0)"> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="($leftW >= (@capacity - $used))"> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="used" select="@capacity" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedW" select="($usedW + @capacity - $used)" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftW" select="($leftW - (@capacity - $used))" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftG" select="$leftG" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="used" select="($used + $leftQ)" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedW" select="($usedW + $leftW)" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftG" select="$leftG" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:when>
<xsl:when test="not($leftG = 0)"> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="($leftG >= (@capacity - $used))"> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="used" select="@capacity" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedW" select="$usedW" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedG" select="($usedG + @capacity - $used)" /> <xsl:with-param name="leftG" select="($leftG - (@capacity - $used))" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="used" select="($used + $leftG)" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedW" select="$usedW" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedG" select="($usedG + $leftG)" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise> <xsl:apply-templates select="."> <xsl:with-param name="used" select="@capacity" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedW" select="$usedW" /> <xsl:with-param name="usedG" select="$usedG" /> </xsl:apply-templates> </xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose> </xsl:template>
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
> This is one possible solution, however it's time complexity is O(N^2) > and can be unacceptable for producing intermediate results from an > operation over a list of N items. > > A recursive solution (such as using the FXSL scanl() > template/function) can have a O(N) complexity.
-- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running tot, Andrew Franz |
Re: [xsl] Stuck on how to properly , Jay Bryant | Date | Re: [xsl] Stuck on how to properly , Rusty Morton |
Month |